Current:Home > FinanceFlorida asks state Supreme Court to keep abortion rights amendment off the November ballot -MoneyFlow Academy
Florida asks state Supreme Court to keep abortion rights amendment off the November ballot
Charles Langston View
Date:2025-04-09 06:38:43
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Lawyers trying to keep an abortion-rights measure off the Florida ballot told the state Supreme Court on Wednesday that the proposed amendment is deceptive, and that voters won’t realize just how far it will expand access to the procedure.
But the justices seemed to think the proposed ballot question isn’t so much a wolf in sheep’s clothing, but rather a clear effort to keep the state from restricting most abortions.
“This is a wolf coming as a wolf,” said Chief Justice Carlos Muniz, one of five appointees of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis on the seven-member court. “The people of Florida aren’t stupid. They can figure it out.”
The proposed amendment says “no law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider.” It provides for one exception, which is already in the state constitution — that parents must be notified before their minor children can get an abortion.
Lawyers for Attorney General Ashley Moody and the religious freedom group Liberty Counsel told justices it would essentially ban any restrictions whatsoever.
“The state of Florida through the Legislature, through the executive and also through the courts will have no ability to protect women or regulate any aspect of abortion,” Liberty Counsel Chairman Mat Staver told reporters after the arguments. “It is a free-for-all. It’s total deregulation of abortion, which is frankly deceptive.”
Proponents of the proposed amendment say the language of the ballot summary and the proposed amendment are concise and that Moody is playing politics instead of letting voters decide whether to protect access to abortions.
“The language of the summary and the amendment are clear and unambiguous,” Courtney Brewer, a lawyer for Floridians Protecting Freedom told reporters after the hearing. “Florida voters will be able to understand that and I am confident based on the court’s questioning today that they understand that as well.”
The group gathered nearly 1 million voter signatures, well more than the 891,523 needed to make the ballot. The court has made clear that it’s role is not to rule on the content of the proposed amendment, but rather, whether it is properly focused on a single subject, and whether voters will understand what they’re voting on.
Florida is one of several states where voters could have a direct say on abortion questions this year.
There has been a major push across the country to put abortion rights questions to voters since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and removed the nationwide right to abortion. Referendums to guarantee abortion rights are set for Maryland and New York, and activists on both sides of the issue in at least seven other states are working to get measures on 2024 ballots.
The case also tests whether DeSantis, who also appointed all three of the women on the bench, has changed the direction of a court that in past years has interpreted a privacy clause in the state constitution to strike down some abortion restrictions. A ruling is expected by April 1.
Both sides of the debate also are waiting on the Florida Supreme Court to rule on whether to uphold a 15-week abortion ban passed two years ago. Last year, lawmakers went further and passed a ban at six weeks, which is before many women even know they are pregnant, but that law won’t take effect if the court throws out the 2022 ban signed by DeSantis.
If the question is allowed on the ballot, 60% of voters would have to approve it.
Any change in abortion access in Florida would be felt out of state as well because the Sunshine State traditionally has been a haven for women in the southeastern U.S. seeking abortions. Nearby Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi ban abortion at all stages of pregnancy. Georgia and South Carolina prohibit terminating pregnancies once cardiac activity can be detected.
veryGood! (76257)
Related
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Annual Report Card Marks Another Disastrous Year for the Arctic
- Meta's Twitter killer app Threads is here – and you can get a cheat code to download it
- Kelis Cheekily Responds to Bill Murray Dating Rumors
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Sanders Unveils $16 Trillion Green New Deal Plan, and Ideas to Pay for It
- Hurricanes and Climate Change
- The Sounds That Trigger Trauma
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Kelis Cheekily Responds to Bill Murray Dating Rumors
Ranking
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Multiple shark attacks reported off New York shores; 50 sharks spotted at one beach
- 100% Renewable Energy Needs Lots of Storage. This Polar Vortex Test Showed How Much.
- Do fireworks affect air quality? Here's how July Fourth air pollution has made conditions worse
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- The 100-year storm could soon hit every 11 years. Homeowners are already paying the price.
- Zendaya Sets the Record Straight on Claim She Was Denied Entry to Rome Restaurant
- Annual Report Card Marks Another Disastrous Year for the Arctic
Recommendation
Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
Dyson Flash Sale: Save $200 on the TP7A Air Purifier & Fan During This Limited-Time Deal
Global Warming Means More Insects Threatening Food Crops — A Lot More, Study Warns
Utilities See Green in the Electric Vehicle Charging Business — and Growing Competition
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
Scandoval Shocker: The Real Timeline of Tom Sandoval & Raquel Leviss' Affair
Animals Can Get Covid-19, Too. Without Government Action, That Could Make the Coronavirus Harder to Control
The Supreme Court Sidesteps a Full Climate Change Ruling, Handing Industry a Procedural Win