Current:Home > InvestExecution date set for Alabama man convicted of killing driver who stopped at ATM -MoneyFlow Academy
Execution date set for Alabama man convicted of killing driver who stopped at ATM
View
Date:2025-04-13 00:13:00
The execution date for a man convicted in the 1998 fatal shooting of a delivery driver who had stopped at an ATM has been set for July 18, Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey announced Thursday.
Keith Edmund Gavin, 64, will be put to death by lethal injection, which is the state's primary execution method.
The announcement came a week after the Alabama Supreme Court authorized the execution to go forward.
Gavin was convicted of capital murder for the shooting death of William Clinton Clayton, Jr. in Cherokee County in northeast Alabama. He was previously convicted of murder and attempted murder for shooting at a law enforcement officer, court documents said, which led to the decision to charge him with two counts of capital murder.
Clayton, a delivery driver, was shot in his van when he stopped at an ATM to get money to take his wife to dinner, prosecutors said.
Witnesses said Gavin approached the vehicle and shot Clayton before stealing the van. An autopsy determined Clayton had three gunshot wounds from two bullets.
A jury voted 10-2 in favor of the death penalty for Gavin. The trial court accepted the jury's recommendation and sentenced him to death.
Gavin's attorney asked the court not to authorize the execution, arguing the state was moving Gavin to the "front of the line" ahead of other inmates who had exhausted their appeals.
The state is also scheduled to execute Jamie Mills by lethal injection on May 30. Mills was convicted for the 2004 slaying of a couple during a robbery.
Alabama in January carried out the nation's first execution using nitrogen gas, but lethal injection remains the state's primary execution method.
- In:
- Alabama
- Homicide
- Crime
- Execution
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Funding Poised to Dry Up for Water Projects in Ohio and Other States if Proposed Budget Cuts Become Law
- Regardless of What Mr. Bean Says, EVs Are Much Better for the Environment than Gasoline Vehicles
- Little Publicized but Treacherous, Methane From Coal Mines Upends the Lives of West Virginia Families
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Clean Energy Experts Are Stretched Too Thin
- SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Receives Final Federal Approval
- Ariana Grande Spotted Without Wedding Ring at Wimbledon 2023 Amid Dalton Gomez Breakup
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Federal Money Begins Flowing to Lake Erie for Projects With an Eye on Future Climate Impacts
Ranking
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Love Seen Lashes From RHONY Star Jenna Lyons Will Have You Taking a Bite Out of Summer
- This 2-In-1 Pillow and Blanket Set Is the Travel Must-Have You Need in Your Carry-On
- Log and Burn, or Leave Alone? Indiana Residents Fight US Forest Service Over the Future of Hoosier National Forest
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Paris Hilton Celebrates 6 Months With Angel Baby Phoenix in Sweet Message
- Q&A: The ‘Perfect, Polite Protester’ Reflects on Her Sit-in to Stop a Gas Compressor Outside Boston
- Save 70% On Coach Backpacks for School, Travel, Commuting, and More
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Here's the Reason Why Goldie Hawn Never Married Longtime Love Kurt Russell
Developer Confirms Funding For Massive Rio Grande Gas Terminal
Revisit Sofía Vergara and Joe Manganiello's Steamy Romance Before Their Break Up
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Log and Burn, or Leave Alone? Indiana Residents Fight US Forest Service Over the Future of Hoosier National Forest
States Test an Unusual Idea: Tying Electric Utilities’ Profit to Performance
Students and Faculty at Ohio State Respond to a Bill That Would Restrict College Discussions of Climate Policies